Contemporary European Studies

CES-DUTH SPOT στην Επικαιρότητα 2/2018

Ανοικτή Επιστολή 23 Πανεπιστημιακών προς τον Αντιπρόεδρο της Επιτροπής 

Frans Timmermans για την κατάσταση του Κράτους Δικαίου στην Πολωνία

Είκοσι επτά (27) Πανεπιστημιακοί, Καθηγητές Ευρωπαϊκού και Συνταγματικού Δικαίου, απευθύνονται με την από 8/6/2018 ανοικτή επιστολή τους προς τον Αντιπρόεδρο της Επιτροπής Frans Timmermans, αρμόδιο για το Κράτος Δικαίου και τον Ευρωπαϊκό Χάρτη των Θεμελιωδών Δικαιωμάτων, ζητώντας την άμεση κίνηση από την Επιτροπή της διαδικασίας της προσφυγής για παράβαση (άρθρο 258 ΣΛΕΕ) καθώς και της λήψης προσωρινών μέτρων (279 ΣΛΕΕ) κατά της Πολωνίας για παραβιάσεις του Κράτους Δικαίου και ειδικότερα των περιορισμών της ανεξαρτησίας της δικαιοσύνης. Οι υπογράφοντες πανεπιστημιακοί στην ουσία καλούν την Επιτροπή να εγκαταλείψει τη διστακτικότητά της και να αξιοποιήσει την πρόσφατη απόφαση του Δικαστηρίου (τμήμα μείζονος συνθέσεως) στην υπόθεση C-64/16, Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses κατά Tribunal de Contas, με την οποία το ΔΕΕ έκρινε ότι όταν οι κυβερνήσεις των Κρατών-μελών περιορίζουν την ανεξαρτησία της δικαιοσύνης παραβιάζουν τα άρθρα 2, 19 παρ. 1 ΣΕΕ σε συνδυασμό με το άρθρο 4 παρ. 3 ΣΕΕ. 

Πηγή verfassungsblog on matters Constitutional: htt ps://verfassungsblog.de/open-letter-to-vice-president-frans-timmermans/

Open Letter to Vice-President Frans Timmermans

Dear Vice-President Timmermans,

We write as legal and constitutional scholars who are particularly concerned with the European Union, democracy, and the rule of law.   

We believe that the time has come for the EU institutions, and the Commission in particular, to take urgent and decisive steps to respond to recent actions of the Polish government that constitute an assault on the rule of law in that country.  The Law and Justice government has adopted laws relating to the courts, the National Council of the Judiciary and the Supreme Court which, when taken together, substantially undermine judicial independence and subordinate the judiciary to the governing party.

The procedure already initiated under Article 7 TEU has thus far brought about only cosmetic amendments to the laws introduced by the government of Poland.  We believe that the law on the Supreme Court should be made the subject of urgent and immediate infringement proceedings under Article 258 and Article 279 TFEU to highlight the violation of provisions such as Articles 2, 4(3) and 19(1) of the Treaty on European Union that the law on the Supreme Court would bring about. 

If the law on the Supreme Court enters into force in the beginning of July, as is currently planned, a large number of sitting judges of that Court will see their tenure unconstitutionally extinguished. In combination with an increase in the number of seats on the Supreme Court, this means that the newly politicized National Council of the Judiciary, elected by the governing party, will be in a position to appoint a majority of the judges on the Supreme Court. We believe this to be in direct contravention of the rule of law, which is proclaimed as a core value of the EU in Article 2 TEU, and of the fundamental requirement of the independence of the judiciary which is a key component of the rule of law.   

We urge the Commission to take the immediate necessary steps to initiate the infringement procedure, with a view to enabling the Court of Justice, in case these laws are not reversed, to rule on the matter. 

In addition to the threat to the rule of law in Poland, we believe that the credibility of the European Union as a whole, and its commitment to the rule of law, is at stake.

Yours sincerely,

Wojciech Sadurski, University of Sydney, University of Warsaw
Gráinne de Búrca, New York University
Bruce Ackerman, Yale University (for purposes of institutional identification only)
Jan Barcz, Kozminski University, Warsaw
Monica Claes, Maastricht University
Paul Craig, Oxford University
Bruno de Witte, Maastricht University and European University Institute, Florence
Gábor Halmai, European University Institute, Florence
Ronald Janse, Open University, Heerlen, the Netherlands
R. Daniel Kelemen, Rutgers University
Claire Kilpatrick, European University Institute, Florence
Tomasz Tadeusz Koncewicz, University of Gdansk; Program in Law and Public Affairs, Princeton University
Martin Krygier, University of New South Wales, Australia
Mattias Kumm, WZB Berlin and New York University
Marcin Matczak, University of Warsaw
Vlad Perju, Boston College
Laurent Pech, Middlesex University London
Kim Lane Scheppele, Princeton University
Robert Schuetze,  Durham University and College of Europe, Bruges
Joanne Scott, European University Institute, Florence
Maximilian Steinbeis,  Verfassungsblog
Neil Walker, University of Edinburgh
Stephen Weatherill, Oxford University